Skip to main content

Transparency

For educators, transparency can mean telling students what material will be covered on a test, or telling them when you have made a mistake. It can mean the difference between building relationships or alienation. What if it also meant telling them WHY you were using a particular technique, or what the PURPOSE of a set of lessons was? Some teachers do this well, some without even understanding why or when they are doing it, and others consciously make an effort to help students make connections - they are studying personal finance because they will be in charge of their finances for example. In STEM education, we often hear teachers explaining that why we focus on those areas is connected to the future job market, which is true, careers in STEM fields are booming. At STEM School, we are also transparent in explaining why we focus on collaboration, critical thinking, and innovation. These skills will not only help them in any career field, but they will also help them in college, in the military, in interacting with social media, in interpreting new information, and in being lifelong learners.

There is still room to grow though for us all. How often do you hear teachers or principals tell students something that is the equivalent of "because I said so"? I would venture to guess more than we care to admit. We do it when we talk about state standards such as testing, we do it when we expect a certain behavior in our classrooms. What if instead of expecting only compliance, we showed our thought processes and praised inquiry? I find myself often being asked "why" by students. "Why do we have to take the ACT?" Your scores can earn you scholarships that help prevent you from being burdened with hefty student loan debt. "Why do we have to put our schedules into a Google calendar?" You have to learn a system of time management before you can adapt one and make it your own.  "Why does it matter if I come to school?" You are valuable and worthy and we want to see you grow and learn. My favorite is "why are we doing this assignment?" Many teachers will agree with me that it would be very easy to sarcastically respond. Instead, I have found that telling students that is a great question bewilders and pleases them in equal measure. It IS a great question. Shouldn't the purpose of a lesson be explicit? Shouldn't they know how it connects to the content or material ? It's a great way to check ourselves, and it's an even better opportunity to make a connection to, and empower, students. If we can't answer why it matters in their lives, what's the point?

As schools we can also move to a more transparent way of interacting with our communities. We can include business partners in internship opportunities, as partners in Project Based Learning, to give feedback to students. We can include our students' parents and family members in exhibitions, in classrooms, and as guest speakers. We can also share best practices in professional development, on social media, and when chatting with someone we bump into at the grocery store. What we do all day isn't copy-written material. If we don't share out and bring in new ideas and information, we remain disjointed and unequal. Every teacher and every school has things they are doing well and areas in which they could improve. We all owe it to our students to practice transparency in our classrooms, in our practices, and as professionals.

Note: Copies of PBL's, rubrics, digital fabrication badging, and other materials used at STEM School Chattanooga can be found here!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Time Is the Variable and Learning Is the Constant

It is time to rethink time, in schools in particular. So many uses of time are ingrained in our educational traditions that we seldom question their validity or purpose. We start at the same times even when report after report demonstrates it is not best for our kids. We require a certain length of seat time, in a day, and in a school year, even when it takes many students shorter or longer than that to learn. We assign (or are assigned by higher authorities) testing windows that take away from instructional time, and often cause high stress levels in students, despite serving no learning purpose. (We can argue about whether they serve other purposes another time, no pun intended.) So let's break some of these down. Many people incorrectly assume the reason for summer breaks is based on farming, check here for an explanation from PBS about the more accurate origins of that decision. Part of the issue was the lack of air conditioning in cities and affluent families leaving those

Why Shouldn't Education Be Fun?

Recently, I have seen some examples of what I will call "fun-shaming" in education. While there is certainly a case to be made for the idea that education shouldn't be engaging alone, looking down on a lesson because it teaches physics AND is fun (hi, almost all experiments involving baking soda), makes zero sense. You can't just play and have fun all day instead  of learning, but why on earth not in addition to learning? If we would rather work at jobs where our skills are valued, we are compensated adequately, and we enjoy our colleagues and workspace and our work itself, why wouldn't we espouse the same theory in classrooms and schools? It starts with a culture of people who love their jobs, and love kids. Most educators start out this way! You know the saying, teachers don't join for the million dollar paychecks. Principals and other admin are under a lot of pressure, students are coming from a range of backgrounds, skills, and needs. Finding a way to

How Do You Elevate Process Skills While Not Watering Down Content?

This is not an easy question to answer, or a simple topic to tackle. As educators, we often find our hands tied by the number and sequence of courses are students are required to take. Sometimes educators are limited even further by what programs or texts they must use. It is virtually ingrained in most adults that the way to do things is a K-12 education with high school being comprised of 22 (give or take) credits, often referred to as  Carnegie Units , which are aimed at one target - being translatable to colleges and universities. So we see students taking the same required courses in high schools all over the country. This should be great for consistency right? It should mean that all high school graduates are prepared for the world that awaits them right? I would love to trace the question of WHY that is the case back to it's source and then convince that person or persons that surely after 150 years it must be time to revisit that system. It in no way ensures that students