Skip to main content

How Do You STEM?

Most schools teach Science and Math, and employ technology, so what makes a STEM school any different? Many schools have added the engineering design process, in creative ways, to multiple content areas. Some people think of places with high tech offerings such as robotics or FabLabs or Maker Spaces with 3-D printers. Does all of this make a STEM School? 

While all of these are excellent examples of methods of engaging and teaching students, these elements don't stand alone to make a school. For STEM models to power a school, and to empower students, there needs to be an underlying structure, a belief system, processes by which content is given a purpose. At STEM School Chattanooga this is exemplified by the tenets "Collaboration, Critical Thinking, and Innovation." These skills are outlined not only in the school mission statement, but also by being the driving force behind all of the decisions that propel the school, and its amazing students, into the future. 

Schools utilizing STEM programming were created in an attempt to prepare students for an increasingly fast-paced and ever changing workforce. This is not so that students can create robots that will someday replace all human workers, though automation continues to rapidly progress. It is so that students can become learners, and eventually adults, who ADAPT. Stakeholders and industry partners have told schools, and me, over and over again that it does not matter what knowledge graduates come pre-equipped with, it matters to them what skills they come equipped with. They can and do teach the rest. This is not to say that our students don't need literacy and numeracy skills, or that they don't require a depth and breadth of content knowledge. Instead it means that process skills such as collaboration and critical thinking breath life into content. So too do they give meaning and value to the purpose of STEM, and all its bells and whistles.

The question remains then, not HOW do you STEM, but how do YOU STEM?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Time Is the Variable and Learning Is the Constant

It is time to rethink time, in schools in particular. So many uses of time are ingrained in our educational traditions that we seldom question their validity or purpose. We start at the same times even when report after report demonstrates it is not best for our kids. We require a certain length of seat time, in a day, and in a school year, even when it takes many students shorter or longer than that to learn. We assign (or are assigned by higher authorities) testing windows that take away from instructional time, and often cause high stress levels in students, despite serving no learning purpose. (We can argue about whether they serve other purposes another time, no pun intended.) So let's break some of these down. Many people incorrectly assume the reason for summer breaks is based on farming, check here for an explanation from PBS about the more accurate origins of that decision. Part of the issue was the lack of air conditioning in cities and affluent families leaving those

How Do You Elevate Process Skills While Not Watering Down Content?

This is not an easy question to answer, or a simple topic to tackle. As educators, we often find our hands tied by the number and sequence of courses are students are required to take. Sometimes educators are limited even further by what programs or texts they must use. It is virtually ingrained in most adults that the way to do things is a K-12 education with high school being comprised of 22 (give or take) credits, often referred to as  Carnegie Units , which are aimed at one target - being translatable to colleges and universities. So we see students taking the same required courses in high schools all over the country. This should be great for consistency right? It should mean that all high school graduates are prepared for the world that awaits them right? I would love to trace the question of WHY that is the case back to it's source and then convince that person or persons that surely after 150 years it must be time to revisit that system. It in no way ensures that students

Transparency

For educators, transparency can mean telling students what material will be covered on a test, or telling them when you have made a mistake. It can mean the difference between building relationships or alienation. What if it also meant telling them WHY you were using a particular technique, or what the PURPOSE of a set of lessons was? Some teachers do this well, some without even understanding why or when they are doing it, and others consciously make an effort to help students make connections - they are studying personal finance because they will be in charge of their finances for example. In STEM education, we often hear teachers explaining that why we focus on those areas is connected to the future job market, which is true, careers in STEM fields are booming. At STEM School, we are also transparent in explaining why we focus on collaboration, critical thinking, and innovation. These skills will not only help them in any career field, but they will also help them in college, in the