Skip to main content

Why Your Child Should Attend STEM School

This is a question I get A LOT. Sometimes from parents of younger siblings who are on the fence about attending, sometimes from people who have never heard of us, and even sometimes at Starbuck's when I'm wearing a STEM shirt before work.

I have too many answers to share them all when I am asked, but I will try to share them here.

1. The number of people who tour our school and say the following: "I wish I had an option like this when I was in school." On the surface this sounds like just a nice compliment, but in reality it says something about the depth of people's disillusionment with more traditional educational models, that have not changed in decades or longer. Research tells us again and again what students needs, but many schools are unwilling to change longstanding practices in instruction, grading, and so on. If you want to attend, or would like your student to attend, a school that believes in changing the paradigm of education, send them to STEM.

2. Opportunities. This word also comes up repeatedly, and I am thrilled to report that it often comes from students themselves. Students want opportunities to meet new classmates, have fresh starts, work in PBL groups, not sit in rows or listen to lectures, to take college classes, to work with people and businesses in their communities. They want all of these opportunities because they in turn open additional doors, to internships, to colleges or universities, to starting their future earlier than some others. The opportunities are endless, we do many things differently than traditional schools, but perhaps the best is that when we tell students that the sky is the limit, we mean it. They make individualized schedules, have more autonomy and independence than typical teenagers, and if we can say yes, we do. Want to accelerate and complete a math course early? Yes, you can. Want to pitch your business plan to investors and launch it after? Yes, you can. Want to make your own schedule and pick your classes like college students? Yes, you can. If these options sound right for your student, send them to STEM.

3. Culture. Inclusivity and relationship-building are foundational here. I can't count the number of students who have shared with me that they didn't feel like they fit in at their previous schools, but that they have great friends and social networks at STEM. Many students remain friends with their middle school classmates, or the people in their neighborhoods, but still make new friends at STEM. We actively seek to shape this as a positive change for students from day one. The emphasis on and instruction in collaboration also plays a role here. The teachers who work at STEM, love coming to school, and love our students and their families. This is so true that we use our own hashtag #STEMkidsarethebestkids, and we mean it. When students are allowed to learn in authentic and engaging ways, they grow to be their best selves. If you want that for your student, send them to STEM.

4. It is a better path to preparing for post-secondary pursuits than any I have ever seen. It has baffled me throughout my career that we expect high school graduates to be ready for the career force (directly after high school or after college), when we tell them everything they need to know, where to sit, when to do everything, and whether they can use the restroom or not. Taking dual enrollment courses not only provides academic rigor, it helps them learn from their mistake...before they (or their parents) are paying thousands of dollars for tuition. It SHOWS them, instead of tells them, how to juggle their time between after school jobs, extracurricular activities, and school work. It affords them the opportunity to put this into practice instead of just being told they will use it "someday" or "in the real world." Many of our graduates come back and visit, and honestly, they tell us themselves that they feel better prepared than the other college freshman, or gap year friends that they know. If you want your student to be more successful after high school, send them to STEM.

5. Challenging environment. Research shows us again that stepping outside comfort zones, exercising the freedom to create and the freedom to FAIL (and actually learn from those missteps and to try again), and to live and learn outside the box, is how innovators change the world. This one is big. Like, really, really big. In a world that has changed so rapidly in such a short time, in a globalized world of business and cultural exchange, we need students to become adults who challenge the status quo and excel in innovating. Students of today need to be able to ADAPT, quickly, and repeatedly, in order to stay competitive and marketable, and happy and stable. We encourage all of our students to do the same. If you want an experience like no other, that prepares your student to think like no other, send them to STEM.


We have supports and scaffolds a'plenty. We have programmatic structures that are akin to accommodations at other school (1:1 tech for all students, flexible seating, multiple opportunities to complete work, and extended deadlines, to name a few). We have Exceptional Ed. teachers, including Gifted programming (that many students elect not to pursue because the curriculum is so enriched). In fact, the only thing that ever leads me to direct a student elsewhere, is if your child requires a very traditional and highly structured setting, and/or you or your child are uncomfortable with change. We make it work for nearly every student who steps through the doors, regardless of academic ability or acumen, regardless of personality, and regardless of whether they are sure they want to be here. For the very few for whom this is really not the right place, it comes down to the aforementioned two items. For the vast majority though, they find their place here and succeed with flying colors.

If someone asks you what you know about STEM, or would like to know more, share this, and feel free to send them to me!









Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Time Is the Variable and Learning Is the Constant

It is time to rethink time, in schools in particular. So many uses of time are ingrained in our educational traditions that we seldom question their validity or purpose. We start at the same times even when report after report demonstrates it is not best for our kids. We require a certain length of seat time, in a day, and in a school year, even when it takes many students shorter or longer than that to learn. We assign (or are assigned by higher authorities) testing windows that take away from instructional time, and often cause high stress levels in students, despite serving no learning purpose. (We can argue about whether they serve other purposes another time, no pun intended.) So let's break some of these down. Many people incorrectly assume the reason for summer breaks is based on farming, check here for an explanation from PBS about the more accurate origins of that decision. Part of the issue was the lack of air conditioning in cities and affluent families leaving those

How Do You Elevate Process Skills While Not Watering Down Content?

This is not an easy question to answer, or a simple topic to tackle. As educators, we often find our hands tied by the number and sequence of courses are students are required to take. Sometimes educators are limited even further by what programs or texts they must use. It is virtually ingrained in most adults that the way to do things is a K-12 education with high school being comprised of 22 (give or take) credits, often referred to as  Carnegie Units , which are aimed at one target - being translatable to colleges and universities. So we see students taking the same required courses in high schools all over the country. This should be great for consistency right? It should mean that all high school graduates are prepared for the world that awaits them right? I would love to trace the question of WHY that is the case back to it's source and then convince that person or persons that surely after 150 years it must be time to revisit that system. It in no way ensures that students

Why Shouldn't Education Be Fun?

Recently, I have seen some examples of what I will call "fun-shaming" in education. While there is certainly a case to be made for the idea that education shouldn't be engaging alone, looking down on a lesson because it teaches physics AND is fun (hi, almost all experiments involving baking soda), makes zero sense. You can't just play and have fun all day instead  of learning, but why on earth not in addition to learning? If we would rather work at jobs where our skills are valued, we are compensated adequately, and we enjoy our colleagues and workspace and our work itself, why wouldn't we espouse the same theory in classrooms and schools? It starts with a culture of people who love their jobs, and love kids. Most educators start out this way! You know the saying, teachers don't join for the million dollar paychecks. Principals and other admin are under a lot of pressure, students are coming from a range of backgrounds, skills, and needs. Finding a way to