Skip to main content

Pathways to Success

As graduation swiftly approaches, I'm bombarded every day with what students are doing after high school. They come in and excitedly share that they were accepted to their dream school, their reach school, the local school, their parent's alma mater, the place where they will have a full ride, or a sweet scholarship. They are thrilled to go into the military, to land a coveted summer internship, to join the family business, to pursue their passions, or take a gap year. They ask for advice, they jump up and down, and they all smile about the possibilities of the future. But no two stories are the same. No two students want or need the same thing during high school, let alone after. I think about this constantly. If the needs are so varied, how do we help them all?

Consider the following examples, (all of which are true). In one graduating class, we had a student who was mature, and academically successful, but whose ACT score didn't reflect that. That student took advantage of the TN Promise and did very well taking online courses at Chattanooga State, while working full time in a potential career field and living independently at 18 years old. We also had a student who struggled to complete any math class but at 16 was operating a lawn care business (not just mowing the neighbor's lawns), who had a stock portfolio and enrolled in Volkswagen Academy after high school. In that same class was the valedictorian, who took multiple advanced math courses at UTC while dual enrolled, and went on to MIT.

These three students stand out in my mind because they were so different in terms of personalities, skills and abilities, interests and passions, and paths, but they were all prepared to tackle what they wanted in their lives, successfully! So I was left to question what we as a school had done to help, whether there were outside factors such as family influence (of course there were), or innate traits (again, yes), and how it came to be that they had the opportunity to do all of these things. At the convergence of all of those points was a trajectory that led each of them, and many others, where they wanted to go in life.

I think the short answer to how do we help all students is to yes, have as many pathway options as possible, but I also think the answer is to teach them the SKILLS they need to be successful wherever they choose to go. They need to be adaptable, they need to have analytical skills and be able to accept feedback. They need to be self reflective and accountable. They need to know when to apply what skill, in what setting or context. It may come as no surprise that whenever I ask educators to list all of the traits students need to be able to succeed, and then to group those into content related skills, or 21st century related skills - the list is far longer on the skill side.

We have to empower students (and each other) to do all of this by giving them the opportunity to try (college courses, PBL, business partnerships), fail or succeed (prototyping iterations, standards-based grading, remediation) and then to try it all again. Most students take roughly the same coursework over the 4 years of high school, but they don't exit with the same dreams. The best we can do is align all school practices and policies with the goal of ensuring they have roughly the same tools in order to pursue them. The pathways to success are paved with these skills, no matter what direction they go.








Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Time Is the Variable and Learning Is the Constant

It is time to rethink time, in schools in particular. So many uses of time are ingrained in our educational traditions that we seldom question their validity or purpose. We start at the same times even when report after report demonstrates it is not best for our kids. We require a certain length of seat time, in a day, and in a school year, even when it takes many students shorter or longer than that to learn. We assign (or are assigned by higher authorities) testing windows that take away from instructional time, and often cause high stress levels in students, despite serving no learning purpose. (We can argue about whether they serve other purposes another time, no pun intended.) So let's break some of these down. Many people incorrectly assume the reason for summer breaks is based on farming, check here for an explanation from PBS about the more accurate origins of that decision. Part of the issue was the lack of air conditioning in cities and affluent families leaving those

How Do You Elevate Process Skills While Not Watering Down Content?

This is not an easy question to answer, or a simple topic to tackle. As educators, we often find our hands tied by the number and sequence of courses are students are required to take. Sometimes educators are limited even further by what programs or texts they must use. It is virtually ingrained in most adults that the way to do things is a K-12 education with high school being comprised of 22 (give or take) credits, often referred to as  Carnegie Units , which are aimed at one target - being translatable to colleges and universities. So we see students taking the same required courses in high schools all over the country. This should be great for consistency right? It should mean that all high school graduates are prepared for the world that awaits them right? I would love to trace the question of WHY that is the case back to it's source and then convince that person or persons that surely after 150 years it must be time to revisit that system. It in no way ensures that students

Why Shouldn't Education Be Fun?

Recently, I have seen some examples of what I will call "fun-shaming" in education. While there is certainly a case to be made for the idea that education shouldn't be engaging alone, looking down on a lesson because it teaches physics AND is fun (hi, almost all experiments involving baking soda), makes zero sense. You can't just play and have fun all day instead  of learning, but why on earth not in addition to learning? If we would rather work at jobs where our skills are valued, we are compensated adequately, and we enjoy our colleagues and workspace and our work itself, why wouldn't we espouse the same theory in classrooms and schools? It starts with a culture of people who love their jobs, and love kids. Most educators start out this way! You know the saying, teachers don't join for the million dollar paychecks. Principals and other admin are under a lot of pressure, students are coming from a range of backgrounds, skills, and needs. Finding a way to