Skip to main content

Why Skills Matter More Than Content - and Why We Need to Teach Them

I recently pitched an idea about consulting with schools to embed explicit instruction in 21st century skills (communication, collaboration etc.) to a room full of peers, judges, and investors. I was a panicked, nervous wreck and did not perform as well as I hoped. Other educators also pitched a plethora of wonderful (and winning) ideas that included cooking lessons for English language learners, using virtual reality field trips for rural students, and connecting elementary students with elderly patients in nursing care facilities. I'm proud to be part of a community of such empathetic and motivated educators. Seriously, it gives me hope for our students and our future.

Over 80% of the groups that pitched also mentioned skills in conjunction with their projects. "This will be great, and it will help them with collaboration!"  "They will learn, have fun, and innovate!"  And they were all right! But, we can't just continue to add these skills on as an afterthought, a bonus to an already great lesson plan.

Hundreds of businesses have given published interviews about the needs of a 21st century workplace. I've spoken to hiring reps, small business owners, and other educators, about what graduates need to be successful in such a rapidly changing work force. They NEVER say, I wish students left high school knowing more about ancient Roman history, or quadratic formulas, well unless they're putting together Ikea furniture. What they do consistently say is that students lack professional communication skills, the ability to proactively manage tasks and generate plans, and the adaptability to maneuver when business needs or plans change. This is true of both high school and college graduates.

We focus so much attention on improving subject content instruction and we can't just pile more responsibility on overburdened administrators, counselors, and teachers, so what do we do instead? We can't continue to ignore the glaring need, so we MUST embed the instruction of those skills in everything we are already doing well - teaching and preparing kids.

We need a framework for what this work looks like that is tailored to individual school vision and mission statements. We don't need boring, lecture based professional development where someone reads to a room full of adults from 300 slides. Instead we need to empower the people already doing great work to generate plans for what that looks like in their buildings, in their rooms, and with their students. It needs to be flexible enough to adapt to changing needs, but structured enough that it permeates every decision made about instructional methods, curriculums used and so on. It needs to be the foundation the rest of the educational decisions are based on.

When this happens, when schools buy in, and educators are empowered to own their own decisions, we will finally see empowered students, ready to compete and succeed in a 21st century world of work.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When Time Is the Variable and Learning Is the Constant

It is time to rethink time, in schools in particular. So many uses of time are ingrained in our educational traditions that we seldom question their validity or purpose. We start at the same times even when report after report demonstrates it is not best for our kids. We require a certain length of seat time, in a day, and in a school year, even when it takes many students shorter or longer than that to learn. We assign (or are assigned by higher authorities) testing windows that take away from instructional time, and often cause high stress levels in students, despite serving no learning purpose. (We can argue about whether they serve other purposes another time, no pun intended.) So let's break some of these down. Many people incorrectly assume the reason for summer breaks is based on farming, check here for an explanation from PBS about the more accurate origins of that decision. Part of the issue was the lack of air conditioning in cities and affluent families leaving those

Why Shouldn't Education Be Fun?

Recently, I have seen some examples of what I will call "fun-shaming" in education. While there is certainly a case to be made for the idea that education shouldn't be engaging alone, looking down on a lesson because it teaches physics AND is fun (hi, almost all experiments involving baking soda), makes zero sense. You can't just play and have fun all day instead  of learning, but why on earth not in addition to learning? If we would rather work at jobs where our skills are valued, we are compensated adequately, and we enjoy our colleagues and workspace and our work itself, why wouldn't we espouse the same theory in classrooms and schools? It starts with a culture of people who love their jobs, and love kids. Most educators start out this way! You know the saying, teachers don't join for the million dollar paychecks. Principals and other admin are under a lot of pressure, students are coming from a range of backgrounds, skills, and needs. Finding a way to

How Do You Elevate Process Skills While Not Watering Down Content?

This is not an easy question to answer, or a simple topic to tackle. As educators, we often find our hands tied by the number and sequence of courses are students are required to take. Sometimes educators are limited even further by what programs or texts they must use. It is virtually ingrained in most adults that the way to do things is a K-12 education with high school being comprised of 22 (give or take) credits, often referred to as  Carnegie Units , which are aimed at one target - being translatable to colleges and universities. So we see students taking the same required courses in high schools all over the country. This should be great for consistency right? It should mean that all high school graduates are prepared for the world that awaits them right? I would love to trace the question of WHY that is the case back to it's source and then convince that person or persons that surely after 150 years it must be time to revisit that system. It in no way ensures that students